Blooms Taxonomy:
Benjamin Bloom developed a set of skills that build upon each
other called Bloom’s Taxonomy. Originally, in the 1950’s these categories were
labeled using nouns, knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis
and evaluation. His taxonomy follows the brains natural thinking process. You cannot
comprehend unless you have the knowledge, you cannot apply these thinking
skills unless you comprehend and understand (knowledge), etc.
About forty years later, a student of Bloom, Lorin Anderson,
revised Bloom’s Taxonomy so that each of the taxonomy levels were now
categorized as verbs. (Churches, 2008). Bloom’s Taxonomy now seems a lot easier
to interpret, helping educators and students to realize that these are skills
that you are going to DO.
Technology integrates nicely with Bloom’s Taxonomy and you can find many versions of Bloom’s Taxonomy which incorporates digital tools.
Retrieved from http://schoolwires.henry.k12.ga.us/cms/lib08/GA01000549/Centricity/Domain/6648/blooms20pyramid.jpg
Retrieved from http://selectedreads.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ipadagogy-wheel-001.jpg?w=1600&h=5220
Based on my budget matrix, in order for students to
successfully implement technology using Bloom’s Taxonomy to its full potential
the configuration that would work the best would be the 1:1 technology
configurations, in other words, the computer lab (equipped with 30 iMacs) and the
portable computer cart (equipped with 25
Chromebooks). But, even so, these configurations have their pros and cons. In
an ideal situation all students would have these technologies at their fingertips
at all points of their school day in order to easily access higher order
thinking skills on a daily basis.
Pros and
Cons of each Configuration:
One
Computer Classroom and Projector:
Pros:
- Access to some technology in your room.
- Technology can be used for whole class instruction
- Save on the school budget with limited technology costs.
Cons:
- Very limited access for students
- Only 1-3 students on the computer at one time.
- Very hard to differentiate instruction, access to Bloom’s Taxonomy is limited.
- When the computer is occupied, no one else can use technology.
Small
Cluster of Computers in the Classroom (10 iMacs):
Pros:
- Access to computers at all points of the day
- Able to differentiate/increased small group work
- All levels of Blooms Taxonomy can be met
- Technology can be used to accommodate ELA and EC learners.
- Technology support for all computers.
Cons:
- Students would need to rotate and share computers.
- Almost all projects would need to be done in groups because of time restraints.
- More classroom management strategies need to be in place to help organize computer time and computer monitoring.
- Increased budget costs for classroom computers/equipment.
- Limited Room Layout
Portable
Computer Cart with 25 Chromebooks:
Pros:
- All student have access to technology (depending on class size)
- All levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy can be met
- Files can be saved easily on devices (students may have to use the same computer-unless there is a Student Share Network)
- Can differentiate instruction and student can be on different tasks at different times-more flexibility
- Room layout does not need to be altered.
- Technology support for all devices.
Cons:
- Increased school budget costs of technology upkeep and new equipment.
- Increased time for teacher and student training (Wainwright, A., n.d.).
- Limited access to cart –share amongst grade levels.
- Increased chance for Chromebooks to break with the transition of devices and their constant mobility.
Computer
Lab 1:1 Technology for all (30 iMacs):
Pros:
- Same Device/same platform
- Every child has access to technology-Equal opportunities
- Uniform integration
- Tech Support for all computers.
Cons:
- Limited access to the lab-share among all classrooms
- Increased school budget costs of technology upkeep and new equipment.
- Increased time for teacher and student training (Wainwright, A., n.d.).
Bring your
own device (BYOD):
Pros:
- Majority of students and teachers already own devices of their own, and for the few students that do not own their own device it is more feasible for schools to purchase a few devices rather than an entire class. (Wainwright, A., n.d.).
- Schools save money
- Student files are easily saved and secured on their own device.
- Students are more familiar and comfortable using their own devices.
Cons:
- Not all students have their own devices.
- Applications are not universal across all platforms, example, Apple Products vs. Android Products. (Wainwright, A., n.d.).
- Costs parents money to pay for devices for their child and/or to pay for applications/networks.
- No tech support for device issues, such as, not being charged, screen size, Firewall settings, network connectivity etc.
Obstacles
with Technology Configurations:
When it comes to technology it is sometimes hard to prepare
for the obstacles that may come your way in the classroom. I have learned over
the past few years of teaching that you should always have a back-up plan
because you never know when the network is going to be offline; a program is
going to be blocked or some other problem that may arise. I have run into
network problems a lot this year and sometimes when planning at home the
websites I am able to access at home on my network are blocked at the school
using their network. I always am preparing some sort of back-up lesson plan
and/or testing the programs at the school before trying to teach the lesson. Scheduling
issues are sometimes a headache when having to share technology with the entire
school and that is an obstacle you will always have to face when technology is
limited. Finally, one of the biggest issues among schools today is school budget
cuts and trying to fit technology costs into the budget. Usually the first
things to get cut out of a budget in many schools tend to be technological
devices/tools and/or those special area teachers, such as, technology lab, math
lab or science lab, when trying to save on their budget. This will only hurt students
in the long run with their future depending so heavily on having skills and knowledge
in the subjects of technology, math and sciences.
Surprises
with the Budget Matrix:
After completing the budget matrix it really surprised me how
much all the devices cost. My budget matrix did not take into account the
additional costs of maintenance and upkeep, which would cause the costs to go
above and beyond the total costs of just the devices. In my classroom, I have 1
Dell Laptop, 2 Dell desktop computers, a projector, 3 Android tablets and a
Nexus Tablet (for testing purposes only). I would be interested to look up each
specific item and total up the cost of my room alone. Each room in my school
has a similar configuration. The hardest part of this assignment was looking up
potential concerns because this is not typically what I look at when looking
into adding technology into my classroom. At the last school that I just came
from had unlimited technology offered to the teachers and students with a
full-time technology integrator and a full-time technology support tech. At the
school I am at now, we have a more limited amount of technology where we have a
district technology support team which we share among all the schools in the
district and a technology integrator which we also share with 1 other school. I
find that even with the limited technology configuration it is still a must to
have that full-time technology integrator at each school in order to properly
and successfully implement Bloom’s Taxonomy using technology in the classroom. Overall,
this was a very eye-opening and engaging project.
References:
Churches, Andrew. (2008). Bloom’s
Taxonomy Blooms Digitally. Retrieved from http://teachnology.pbworks.com/f/Bloom%5C's+Taxonomy+Blooms+Digitally.pdf
[Subject and type of work]. Retrieved January 4, 2015, from: http://schoolwires.henry.k12.ga.us/cms/lib08/GA01000549/Centricity/Domain/6648/blooms20pyramid.jpg
[Subject and type of work]. Retrieved January 4, 2015, from: http://selectedreads.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ipadagogy-wheel-001.jpg?w=1600&h=5220
Wainwright, A. (n.d.). Pros
and Cons of BYOD and 1-to-1 technology in the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.securedgenetworks.com/strategy-blog/Pros-and-Cons-of-BYOD-and-1-to-1-Technology-in-the-Classroom
You made a comment about how your school shares a technology integrator with another school. I think that in smaller district this seems to be the case. This posses an interesting thought. I was just thinking that to me it seems strange that since their is so much evidence for the notion that if technology integration is done correctly it increases student understanding as well as supports 21st century learning skills it would seem that having a strong technology integrator in each school would be crucial, just as you mentioned. However in the meantime we can continue to use resources like learn nc to help assist us with this integration.
ReplyDelete